We Kid You Not Childfree Forums

Full Version: Minimum Wage Increase is still not enough (duh!)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

PrairieGirl

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=5441487&page=1

Surviving (or Not) on Minimum Wage
Today's 70-cent Jump in the Minimum Wage Is Still Not Enough, Say Workers
By MARCUS BARAM

July 24, 2008 —

The country's lowest-paid workers will get raises today as the federal minimum wage increases 12 percent, or 70 cents, from $5.85 to $6.55 an hour.

But that's still not enough to pay the bills, say some members of the working class, including many who already earn more than the minimum wage.

Barbara Stepney, a 57-year-old grandmother in Baltimore, makes $7.15 an hour working in the laundry of a Comfort Inn. She says she can't afford health insurance, a car, or her own apartment.

"I'm slowly getting by," says Stepney, who contributes $350 to her sister's monthly rent. The rest of her paycheck goes to buying groceries, at $25 to $100 a week.

How Is the Economy Treating You? Tell ABC News

Although she's close to retirement age, Stepney says she's about to take a second job, just so she can afford clothes, but even then, health insurance remains prohibitively expensive for someone her age.

"It's not enough money to make ends meet," she despairs. "I do the best I can  taking the bus, using coupons, but this ain't living."

Antonio Clemens, 31, who makes about $7.85 an hour at the Memphis Music Café, can't afford health insurance and is unable to save money in between paying $685 a month in rent on the apartment he shares with his wife and their two young children.

"You start to feel like you're really not going to make it," he says. "Look, I'm making over a dollar more than the minimum wage and it's tough to make ends meet. Instead of date nights, we stay home and play Battleship."

As part of a three-stage increase in the wage, passed by Congress last year, the minimum wage will jump to $7.25 per hour in July 2009. But almost half the country, 24 states, already have higher minimum wages, ranging from $6.79 in Florida to $8.07 in Washington State. The average wage in the country is $18.01 an hour, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

About 60 percent of minimum-wage workers labor in leisure and hospitality jobs, such as food preparation, and tend to be younger and unmarried, according to the BLS.

The numbers just don't add up for millions of Americans making close to minimum wage, say fair-wage advocates, especially in light of increases in gas and food prices.

Government surveys show the average price of a gallon of milk jumped from $2.67 in June 2003 to $3.77 in June 2008, and the price of a dozen grade A eggs has more than doubled, from 97 cents in June 2002 to $1.92 in Jun 2008.

The minimum wage increase represents a $28 increase in weekly wages, which is barely higher than the $21.18 increase in money spent on food and gas each week in 2008, according to the Center for American Progress.

"You can't live anywhere in this country on $13,624 dollars a year," says Jason Perkins-Cohen, executive director of the Job Opportunities Task Force in Baltimore, crunching the numbers on what the new minimum wage translates into as an annual salary.

"It's not enough to pay for housing, to put food on the table, to keep your house lit and warm."

Perkins-Cohen welcomes the wage increase, saying that every little bit helps low-income workers afford a few more groceries or higher electricity bills, but he stresses that it's just not enough.

"We can't sit back and feel terrific about ourselves and say we've made a dent in poverty," he explains, adding that many minimum wage workers he knows need to work an extra job or move in with roommates or family members. "We have to find a way for them to move up  should you really be living in poverty if you're working around the clock?"

Barbara Ehrenreich, who tried living for three months by working low-wage jobs in her 2000 book, "Nickel and Dimed," says that she wouldn't survive the same experiment today due to increases in rent, gas prices and food prices. She had to give up her experiment while living in the Minneapolis area, where her $250 a week rent in a residential motel was more than she was bringing home in her $7-an-hour job at Wal-Mart.

"I can't even imagine doing that today," says Ehrenreich. "Not without being homeless and that is a condition that I ruled out. I'm not going to go there."

Beth Shulman, co-director of the Fairness Initiative on Low-Wage Work, says that the minimum wage is at its lowest value in 50 years when indexed to inflation, explaining that it should be more than $9 an hour.

For her book, "The Betrayal of Work: How Low-Wage Jobs Fail 30 Million Americans," Shulman interviewed workers around the country and heard their stories.

"It was always an awful choice between necessities  when the refrigerator went out and you paid for that, you didn't have enough money to pay the rent, if your car broke down, you don't have enough money to put food on the table. Many go without health care and the jobs don't provide sick leave, so when the kids get sick, they lose wages for that day. It's the same crisis over and over and over again. People living on the edge of total despair."

Some business groups oppose the wage increase, arguing that it hurts small businesses and impedes their ability to hire low-wage workers.

"The increased revenue to support these higher wages is harder for small businesses than for the big-box store down the block," says Marc Freedman, the director of labor law policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Freedman claims that the wage increase has the ironic consequence of stopping employers from hiring at higher wages, a natural effect of market forces, and results in them lowering salaries to the minimum wage level.

And some financial analysts say that it is possible to become a millionaire on the minimum wage  if you start young and you've got decades to spare.

"Socking away a little bit of money  even $20 a week  and investing it in the stock market over 50 years, with a 10 percent historical rate of return for the S&P 500, will bring you a lot of money," says Robert Brokamp, retirement expert at themotleyfool.com.

Brokamp adds that low-income earners can benefit from tax incentives such as the earned income credit, a refundable credit for people who save.

"They will give you money even if you don't owe any money  if you're making minimum wage, you're probably eligible."

Stepney, the grandmother in Baltimore, was skeptical that she could have become a millionaire. "Maybe if I won the lottery -- that's about it."

----------------------------

NOTE TO ROBERT BROKAMP -- If you save $20/week, and invest it for 30 years (not 50 -- 30 years is the amount of years most people save until retirement) in the S&P at its HISTORIC (not current) rate of return of 8% (not 10% -- it has never been 10%!!!), you will have........a whoppin' $125,000!!! After thirty years! That's not enough to retire on, and it's not even enough to supplement Social Security. Over 50 years, it's $623,000, which would indeed supplement your income to the tune of $25k a year. But it means saving every week, from age 18 until 68, which most people don't have the discipline to do. And it assumes that $25k will be worth anything in 50 years.
And some financial analysts say that it is possible to become a millionaire on the minimum wage  if you start young and you've got decades to spare.

"Socking away a little bit of money  even $20 a week  and investing it in the stock market over 50 years, with a 10 percent historical rate of return for the S&P 500, will bring you a lot of money," says Robert Brokamp, retirement expert at themotleyfool.com.


Oh please. For someone who is living on minimum wage, that $20 can be the difference between having gas to get to work and losing their job. I hate financial "advice" from people who have obviously never been poor.

Sure, that $20 can turn into a lot of money down the road. But people need to eat now.

PrairieGirl

BTW, to reach $1 million in savings, you would need to save for 56 years. That is, 56 years in which the market NEVER goes down, and always hits 8%, every single year. At least as an average. (With the recent economic troubles, plus the tech meltdown a few years ago, the S&P's historical average has dropped to 6% -- at that rate, it would take 70 years to save $1 million).
We were just discussing this in class last night. I'll see if I can dig up the article we had a copy of. The cost of this increase is going to be passed on to consumers, so really this increase doesn't do any good assuming that the people making minumum wage will also be paying higher prices for their own increase !

Apparently minimum wage 40yrs ago was 10+$/hr which is crazy. Our professor also said it took 10yrs for this bill to pass as Congress faught it all the way.

I wonder, is the general consensus in the public that people that are "living" on minimum wage have just made poor choices? I just find it hard to believe that we have MILLIONS of people as working poor and yet we are losing more jobs every day. What exactly is everyone going to do for a living to make decent money in this country? I sometimes look around at school and think every year there are tens of thousands of college grads and more now than ever school is the way to go. You have to have it to have any sort of future, but I do wonder where the line is drawn. I mean there will eventually be market saturation as our population increases year after year.

PrairieGirl

I think the argument the financial "intelligentsia" make is that the only people making minimum wage are teenagers and retired seniors -- people who have income from another source (teens stay home, elderly have SS and pensions) -- and thus they don't need a single wage to make them self-sufficient.

But as the article points out, only 60% of minimum wage earners fall into that category. The other 40% are fucking trying to make a living!

I think, sadly, that there's some assumption that non-teens and non-seniors who are earning minimum wage have "brought it on themselves" somehow -- they didn't take advantage of an educational system, they didn't go to college, they got themselves into drugs, they got themselves into jail, they got knocked up and they chose to drop out of school, they chose to stay home and be a SAHM then their husbands left them, they were lazy, they were unmotivated....they they they, and thus THEIR fault.

And it's okay to feel that way, when you're talking about a very small percentage of people -- say, maybe as much as 5%. But we're talking 40% of the population! That's 40% of adults, trying to make it, trying to live without public assistance, trying to live lives that include families, and lovers, and ailing parents, and debt, and spending, and saving. It's a whole segment of the population that we are writing off, nearly half of working citizens that we say are lazy, worthless, shiftless, etc. BTW, that's the same percentage of the population that has children in the home -- 40%. We put tons of energy and attention into the 40% who have children, and ignore the 40% who are incapable of earning a living wage -- and BTW if we paid attention to those 40% who are under-earning, perhaps THEY THEMSELVES could take care of their own damn children!
Most of my contemporaries that I have known for decades have been struggling at minimum wage or just above that every since teenage-hood.
These are intelligent motivated people, and every one has one or more college or university diplomas or degrees.
They tend to work two jobs and occasionally more just to cover their bills, so the arguement of them being lazy or stupid just doen't wash.
At least around here, it is the rare person who has a stable good-paying job.
I make 11.75 an hour and am barely able to survive. Seriously, how the hell can you live on seven bucks an hour?
I used to make minimum wage, and I "lived" on it. You can only do it if you have NO debt, no credit cards to incur debt, and you live very frugally in a cheap apartment, no car, a bus pass or a bike, simple foods and few activities. It's POSSIBLE, but hard. I remember a good chunk of my life was being broke for a week at a time as I waited for payday. Then on payday, you pay some bills, get your groceries and have something like $15 left over and maybe you go see a movie or buy some second hand clothes or something.

It's much easier if you live with someone. Living alone is hard one one minimum wage salary.
Nickle and Dimed. Great book!
Reference URL's