We Kid You Not Childfree Forums

Full Version: Women Dropping out of Workforce -- but not for the reasons you think!
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

PrairieGirl

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Parenting/stor...072&page=1

Women Across the Board Dropping Jobs
Study Finds Women Leaving the Workforce Because of Economy, Not to Care for Kids
By BIANNA GOLODRYGA and JONANN BRADY

July 22, 2008 —

The number of women in the workplace has been declining for several years and experts had theorized that more women were deciding to forego careers and be stay-at-home moms.

But a Congressional study released today found that women aren't "opting out" of the workforce to raise children. For the first time in nearly a half-century, they are being forced onto the sideline by bad economic times.

The number of women entering the workforce had increased steadily since the 1960s, spurred on by the women's rights movement and a booming economy. The percentage of women with jobs peaked in 2000 at 75 percent.

While there have been slight dips in the number of working women in the past five decades, those numbers have always bounced back even stronger than before. But since 2000, the percentage of women finding jobs has remained below that 75 percent peak. As of June 2008, it stood at 73 percent.

That may seem like a small number, but those 2 percentage points represent about 4 million women who are not employed.

Tootie Samson of Baxter, Iowa, was laid off nine months ago from her job on the assembly line at Maytag.

"I enjoyed the life there and the people that I worked with, and I enjoyed working on a new product," said the 48-year-old mother.

She's spent countless hours looking for a new job, but the amount of money she's being offered doesn't compare to what she was earning.

"Most of them pay $8, $9. At Maytag our base pay was $20 an hour, plus we got incentives," Samson said.

A drop in pay is a big reason more women in their prime earning years, between 25 and 54, are leaving the workplace, the study said.

Median pay for women has gone from $15.04 in 2004 to $14.84 today, according to the Economic Policy Institute.

More women have left manufacturing jobs than any other sector, but the Congressional report found that women across the spectrum  whether white-collar, blue-collar, single, married, black or white  have been affected.

Women on average bring home about one third of the family income, so their defection from the workplace could have a devastating effect on the economy down the road.

Tootie Samson and others like her are worrying about the here and now.

"I still have a child at home and have to look into that in four years she will be looking at going to college, and with the price of everything going up, it's very hard," she said.

What Does It Mean to You?

"GMA" workplace contributor Tory Johnson answers some frequently asked questions about the congressional report's findings.

How big of a difference is this?

It's an enormous difference.

It erases more than 12 years of gains in terms of women joining the workforce. That translates into 4 million more women in their prime earning years who would normally be in the workforce now, but are not.

We've been hearing for the past few years that women were "opting out," choosing to stay home to raise their kids. But this new research shows that's simply not true. Women have dropped out for gender-neutral reasons: an economic downturn that brought layoffs, outsourcing and even pay cuts, which has made the decision to drop out a fairly straightforward one for many women. And it has nothing to do with motherhood.

Is there a pattern based on level of education, race or marital status?

No. This study finds that the trend is across the board for women: white collar/blue collar; single/married; black/white; with teens or with toddlers. Everyone is affected.

What effect does this have on the family?

It's not good at all. Women are no longer able to act as a financial safety net. Women typically bring home a third of their family's income, and of course single mothers are the sole breadwinners in their households. So this leaves those families very vulnerable.

And, in past recessions, when a woman was not working and her husband lost his job, she could go out and get a job to fill the gap. But that is no longer the case now that women are experiencing job losses as steeply as men.

What is the single most important thing to do for women who want to get back into the workforce?

Retraining. More than 1 million women have lost manufacturing jobs since 2001. These women found that jobs available to them paid less, so many of them said forget it. If they want to get back to work in a different field and at a higher wage, they need more education and new skills.

Copyright © 2008 ABC News Internet Ventures
For the first time in nearly a half-century, they are being forced onto the sideline by bad economic times.

So are men. The economy sucks for everyone. Not just women.

She's spent countless hours looking for a new job, but the amount of money she's being offered doesn't compare to what she was earning.

So she's choosing not to work. That's a lot different than being "forced onto the sideline."

Women have dropped out for gender-neutral reasons: an economic downturn that brought layoffs, outsourcing and even pay cuts, which has made the decision to drop out a fairly straightforward one for many women.

Do the authors even know what they're trying to say? They argued at first that women are being "forced" out of work, but then they changed their story to say that women are choosing to not work. Very irritating.

Overall, it's yet another article about women who choose not to work. When will the media shut up about this?
Hear hear, Nadleeh... CHOOSING not to work is not an option for a lot of us. It's so stupid to say that the economy is pushing you OUT of work when you STILL NEED TO PAY THE BILLS. Duh.

ETA: these women are choosing not to work because they'd rather earn nothing than earn less than they think they are worth. Interesting. When the bills come in, someone has to pay it somehow, though. Must be nice to not have to worry about that.

PrairieGirl

Yes, isn't it interesting how the news is lately getting to be quite convoluted in its "amazing, shocking and surprising" results reporting? This whole article had me squinting in confusion.

If it's the economy, then men would be feeling the pressure, too!
That made no sense whatsoever! If you have a choice about whether to work, then you don't need that money as badly as you thought you did. I know plenty of folks (including my own DH at a couple of points) who have taken jobs that didn't pay as well as ones they had previously. They did so because they had to in order to meet their financial obligations.
It's been a while since I studied this... but didn't women get forced out of the workforce after WWII?

This article is a big DUH.

The majority of women have kids at some point. If you talk to a few of them, you'll find a bunch of different explanations for their work history (or lack of it). Of course the economy plays a part. So do life circumstances (like whether there's a second income in the picture or whether there is an illness in the family or [insert circumstance that would affect work here]).

I guess the point of the article was that previous articles that totally oversimplified this issue (women are rejecting the equality that second wave feminists fought so hard for...) and that (gasp!) women are complex people with all kinds of reasons for leaving the workforce. Rolleyes
The part about wages dropping is so true.

When I was looking for another job (first when I decided I hated my job and then when I was told I may be laid off,) NO ONE could match my current salary--and it's not even that high to begin with!

I'm very fortunate and infinitely grateful that I ultimately stayed with my company. I don't know what would have happened if I had been laid off and not able to find a comparable salary.

I really feel for everyone out of a job right now, woman and man alike!
Jen M.
Reference URL's