We Kid You Not Childfree Forums

Full Version: Should this woman be charged?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Jury convicts mom of lesser charges in online hoax
By GREG RISLING – 13 hours ago

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A Missouri mother on trial in a landmark cyberbullying case was convicted Wednesday of only three minor offenses for her role in a mean-spirited Internet hoax that apparently drove a 13-year-old girl to suicide. The federal jury could not reach a verdict on the main charge against 49-year-old Lori Drew — conspiracy — and rejected three other felony counts of accessing computers without authorization to inflict emotional harm.

Instead, the panel found Drew guilty of three misdemeanor offenses of accessing computers without authorization. Each count is punishable by up to a year in prison and a $100,000 fine. Drew could have gotten 20 years if convicted of the four original charges.

U.S. District Judge George Wu declared a mistrial on the conspiracy count. There was no immediate word on whether prosecutors would retry her.

"I don't have any satisfaction in the jury's decision," said Drew's lawyer, Dean Steward. "I don't think these charges should have ever been brought."

Tina Meier, the mother of the dead girl, said Drew deserves the maximum of three years behind bars.

"For me it's never been about vengeance," she said. "This is about justice."

Prosecutors said Drew and two others created a fictitious 16-year-old boy on MySpace and sent flirtatious messages from him to teenage neighbor Megan Meier. The "boy" then dumped Megan in 2006, saying, "The world would be a better place without you." Megan promptly hanged herself with a belt in her bedroom closet.

Prosecutors said Drew wanted to humiliate Megan for saying mean things about Drew's teenage daughter. They said Drew knew Megan suffered from depression and was emotionally fragile.

"Lori Drew decided to humiliate a child," U.S. Attorney Thomas O'Brien, chief federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, told the jury during closing arguments. "The only way she could harm this pretty little girl was with a computer. She chose to use a computer to hurt a little girl, and for four weeks she enjoyed it."

O'Brien, who pronounced the case the nation's first cyberbullying trial, said the jury's decision sent a worthy message: "If you have children who are on the Internet and you are not watching what they are doing, you better be."

Most members of the six-man, six-woman jury left court without speaking to reporters. One juror, who identified himself by his first name only, Marcilo, indicated jurors were not convinced Drew's actions involved the intent alleged by prosecutors.

"Some of the jurors just felt strongly that it wasn't tortious and everybody needed to stay with their feeling. That was really the balancing point," he said.

The case hinged on an unprecedented — and, some legal experts say, highly questionable — application of computer-fraud law.

Drew was not directly charged with causing Megan's death. Instead, prosecutors indicted her under the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which in the past has been used in hacking and trademark theft cases.

Among other things, Drew was charged with conspiring to violate the fine print in MySpace's terms-of-service agreement, which prohibits the use of phony names and harassment of other MySpace members.

"This was a very aggressive, if not misguided, theory," said Matt Levine, a New York-based defense attorney and former federal prosecutor. "Unfortunately, there's not a law that covers every bad thing in the world. It's a bad idea to use laws that have very different purpose."

Drew's lawyer, Steward, contended his client had little to do with the content of the messages and was not at home when the final one was sent. Steward also argued that nobody reads the fine print on service agreements.

Prosecutors said Drew, her then-13-year-old daughter Sarah and Drew's 18-year-old business assistant Ashley Grills set up the phony MySpace profile for a boy named "Josh Evans," posting a photo of a bare-chested boy with tousled brown hair. "Josh" then told Megan she was "sexi" and assured her, "i love you so much."

Grills allegedly sent the final, insulting message to Megan before she killed herself in the St. Louis suburb of Dardenne Prairie, Mo.

Missouri authorities said there was no state law under which Drew could be charged. But federal prosecutors in California claimed jurisdiction because MySpace is based in Beverly Hills.

Sarah Drew testified she never saw her mother use the MySpace account. But Grills, testifying under immunity from prosecution, said she saw Drew type at least one message under the name Josh Evans.

After the suicide, Missouri passed a law against cyber-harassment. Similar federal legislation has been proposed on Capitol Hill.

The trial's outcome was a victory for prosecutors despite the lack of a felony conviction, said Nick Akerman, a New York lawyer who specializes in cases involving the federal computer act.

"What you learned is that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act is an extremely important tool in the federal arsenal against computer crime," he said.

MySpace said in a statement that it "respects the jury's decision and will continue to work with industry experts to raise awareness of cyberbullying and the harm it can potentially cause."
On the one hand, what this woman did is reprehensible - especially considering she knew about the girl's fragile emotional state.

On the other hand, the girl killed herself. The mother did not murder her.

Having said that, if it was my daughter that was dead, I'd want justice.
NKBurlington Wrote:On the one hand, what this woman did is reprehensible - especially considering she knew about the girl's fragile emotional state.

On the other hand, the girl killed herself. The mother did not murder her.

Having said that, if it was my daughter that was dead, I'd want justice.

I agree. Young teen girls are extremely vulnerable, and an adult fucking with a little girl's head and goading her to suicide, in my uneducated in the practice of law opinion, is a crime.

Adults are supposed to protect kids because they're really aren't equipped to look after themselves, they are highly susceptible to cruel mind games, and the fact that this was an adult fucking with her mind, instead of another kid who doesn't know any better, is horrifying to me. Especially because I could easily see myself in the girl's shoes if we had the internet back in those days. I was already living in a miserable home, that made me vulnerable to feeling depressed and suicidal anyway, add to that the normal, yet excruciating, teenage girl angst, add to that an adult who can easily manipulate me online, I can see myself going the same way. I'm actually really happy I didn't have the internet as a kid. I was fucked with and bullied enough at school, I can't imagine how extra horrible it would have been to be bullied in my own home online.

Just one more thing I don't have to worry about for children of my own since I'll never have any.
I voted yes too, for the same reasons. It apalls me that an adult would do something like this. What a sick bitch.
This woman is clearly a sociopath and should be locked away from the rest of society until she dies. She has no conscience, hasn't shown any remorse, and what's going to stop her from doing it again if she just gets off with a slap on the wrist?

This case makes me so angry I can't see straight. This bitch needs to be coated with honey and thrown into a pit of fire ants.
Yes, deliberately causing harm to another is a crime.
Age, mother, daughter, Myspace, whatever...it doesn't matter. She knew the girl was depressed, she knew pretending to be a cute boy would cheer her up, and she knew "dumping" her would cause trauma. That woman is sick in the head.
that is just terrible. how an adult can sink to the level of pulling such a childish stunt as to make a fake myspace page just to crush a little girl is beyond me. While this is terrible, i have to ask, where were her parents during all of this? The internet while a WONDERFUL tool, is full of a lot of horrible people as well. Why wernt mommy and daddy monitoring what their daughter was doing online? a 13 year old girl is extremely susceptible to being targeted by child molesters, and other monsters out there. Parents need to do a better job of monitoring what their kids do on computers, and be more involved in their kids lives. It doesnt excuse what the other mother did in any way shape or form, it just goes to show you what kind of monsters are really out there. It isnt just sicko child molesters who want to prey on children, its the mom next door too.....scary if you ask me.

-Joe
ITA with what everyone else said. I can understand 13-year-olds being bitches to each other, but I can't understand why a 49-year-old woman would stoop to such a childish, nasty, cruel prank. If she had a problem with Megan's behavior towards her daughter, she should have discussed it with Megan or with Megan's mother.
Absolutely. A grown woman deliberately harassing a 13 year old to the point of suicide? You've got to be kidding me.
This story sounded like something right out of Law & Order
What a Loon!
Yes. Absolutely. Everyone else has already said it: Adults are responsible for protecting children or at least not harming them. This woman knew what she was doing. She's a sicko.

I was bullied, as well, and I was a very depressed teenager. What this woman did was reprehnsible.

Jen M.
Reference URL's